What is referred to as “Lincoln's Rule” in legal strategy?

"Lincoln's Rule" in legal strategy refers to the approach of attacking the law or the facts when they do not favor the client's case. This strategy emphasizes the importance of addressing and undermining the opposition's legal standing or factual claims rather than focusing on personal attacks or witness credibility. By challenging the validity and applicability of the law or the circumstances surrounding the facts, a lawyer can shift the narrative and create reasonable doubt or grounds for a favorable outcome. This method reflects a strategic mindset often attributed to Abraham Lincoln, who was known for his sharp legal acumen and ability to leverage legal principles to benefit his clients.

The other options do not align with the essence of Lincoln's Rule. Attacking the judge would be unprofessional and could backfire in a legal context. Preparing to settle without trial is more of a tactical consideration rather than a direct approach to unfavorable facts or laws. Focusing solely on witness credibility is important but does not encompass the broader strategy implied by Lincoln's Rule, which is about addressing the foundational issues of the case rather than individual testimonies.