Which aspect is NOT considered when determining the legal identification of evidence?

The correct answer is that the aspect of whether the evidence was collected by police is not considered when determining its legal identification. Legal identification of evidence is crucial for its admissibility in court, and it relies on factors that help establish continuity, integrity, and authenticity.

The condition of the evidence at the time of collection compared to how it is presented later in court is critical, as it helps to ensure that it has not been tampered with or altered in a significant way. Substantial similarity in condition supports the reliability and legitimacy of the evidence.

Who has had possession of the evidence is also a vital factor. This aspect helps establish a chain of custody, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of the evidence throughout the investigative process. If the evidence has been handled improperly, it could affect its admissibility.

Any changes made to the evidence, whether by handling, testing, or any other means, are also assessed to affirm that the evidence remains reliable and has not lost its original context or significance. Understanding what alterations have been made is key to maintaining the evidence's integrity.

In contrast, the aspect of who collected the evidence does not directly influence its legal identification. While proper collection procedures are important for admissibility, the mere fact that it was collected by police