Which of the following principles is NOT part of the legal aspect of admissibility in evidence collection?

Irrelevance is not part of the legal aspect of admissibility in evidence collection in the same way the other principles are. In legal contexts, evidence must be relevant to the case in order to be admissible. If evidence is deemed irrelevant, it simply does not pertain to the facts in the case, and therefore, does not assist in proving or disproving a point that is material to the outcome of the case.

The other principles—quality of evidence, materiality, and competency—are foundational to determining the admissibility of evidence. Quality refers to the reliability and integrity of the evidence collected, making sure that it can be trusted and is credible. Materiality pertains to whether the evidence is significant and has a legitimate bearing on the case, while competency relates to whether the evidence meets legal standards and can be considered valid in court. Each of these principles plays a critical role in ensuring that the evidence presented aids in the pursuit of justice by being both relevant and applicable in the legal context.